Viruses that don’t exist, baby jabs that lead to autism and who knows what else, graphene oxide jabs posing as “vaccines”, eugenics programs posing as “health services”… Medical cabal, we’re onto you, and we’ve had enough.
It is time to stop injecting our babies with mercury, aluminium and monkey kidney cells in order to develop antibodies to something that does not exist. I have already written about the existence of viruses but I’d like to recap here. The pressure to “vaccinate” babies is intense, and can make parents give in despite their reservations.
Recap
In time I will get through the full list of common viruses, to examine the pros and cons of their existence. In previous articles I’ve covered:
Smallpox
Compulsory smallpox vaccination made death statistics worse, not better. Leicester in England eradicated smallpox with improved hygiene and nutrition. Dr Charles Campbell in the United States discovered that smallpox was transmitted only by bedbug bites, never between humans. It was only serious in severely vitamin C-deficient individuals. No virus has ever been isolated.
Sources
Polio
The disease appears identical to DDT poisoning. A polio virus has not been isolated.
Sources
Measles
As a result of adjudicating a dispute over a prize for the first person to isolate the measles virus, the Supreme Court of Germany found that there is no evidence of the existence of a measles virus.
Sources
Rabies
The symptoms of rabies are caused by a toxin with distinct similarities to snake venom. This toxin is purported to come from the glycoproteins on the surface of a virus, but no scientist has ever been able to isolate this virus. A similar toxin already exists in nature without the presence of a virus.
Sources
HIV
An HIV test does not look for an HIV virus, because such a virus has never been isolated. The images you see are computer simulations of what it may look like if they ever find it. The test looks for antibodies. These are supposed to be antibodies to the virus but in reality there is no way of knowing what generated them—it’s more likely to be your own cell particles. The virusmyth website has more information and is dedicated to exposing the HIV fraud.
Covid-19
Teams of scientists in many different countries have attempted to isolate a virus and have never found one.
Source
Seasonal colds and flu
Vast amounts of research have been carried out in attempts to transmit them from one individual to another, but no amount of mucus swabbed from an affected person can make a healthy person sick. It is simply impossible. I have shared a video describing these experiments in a later section of this article.
What is isolation?
In science, to isolate means that you take material from a sick person, extract a micro-organism, transfer it to a healthy person, and reproduce the same symptoms. On the contrary, watch this short video to see what “isolation” means in virology. When you don’t apply fake science, it is obvious that diseases are not caused by viruses.
The big question
The bottom line is, if a virus does not exist, then why would we choose to subject ourselves, our babies and our pets to injections, many of which have proved so harmful? It is all about balancing risk. Each of us has to ask ourselves, do viruses exist? If so, are they really dangerous pathogens? Or is there a greater risk in possibly being harmed by the injections? Until there is honest scientific consensus, whether or not to accept a jab can only be a personal decision based on who you trust and who you don’t.
How well-equipped are we to judge who to trust? Those of us who remember the days when everyone got measles, know that measles was not feared anywhere except Africa, where severe vitamin A deficiency could turn it into a killer disease. So why are doctors and the media in well-nourished Western societies now trying to make us afraid of measles?
I have great admiration for homeopaths, who stand firmly against pharmaceutical vaccines. But as for the rest of us, if you believe now that you would say “No” to vaccinating your child, this article which Victoria Lambert wrote about her own experience may give you pause for thought.
I began by rereading the original research published in the Lancet. I talked to other mothers and heard the familiar themes repeated: the fear of autism; the lack of confidence in the health system; the belief that measles isn't a serious disease now. Then, I went back to all those articles that I had worried over as an editor and I worried over them again as a parent.
Victoria Lambert, 2006, writing in The Telegraph
Read her article: “Should I give my girl the MMR jab?”
As our child’s medical team makes it very clear that vaccine hesitancy is irresponsible, and the little “What if they’re right…?” devil whispers in our ear, we hold our breath, hope for the best, and, like Victoria, allow the needle to go in. Will we regret it? Will our child be damaged? The nurse smiles with approval, the child appears to have suffered no ill effects, and we assume all is well.
So, are childhood vaccines harmful?
As expected, there is a paucity of published research in the scientific journals about the possible long-term effects of childhood vaccines. It is extremely difficult to find funding for research like this. It is prohibitively expensive even to abide by some of the rules deemed necessary for research to be taken seriously. I recall when I was taking part in a radio show in 1991, I was asked where was my research? I replied that I had no research funding, and was told “All you need is a photocopier”. That is absolutely untrue, as you will see if you read on.
So when viewing the following studies, which are highly professional despite their basic methodology, I recommend reading them as a parent, not as an academic.